5 ms·
EFF's Privacy Badger and Firefox's (experimental) first-party isolation go _some_ way to mitigating this bad behaviour. But taking special measures shouldn't b
by andrewaylett 7y ago
EFF's Privacy Badger and Firefox's (experimental) first-party isolation go _some_ way to mitigating this bad behaviour. But taking special measures shouldn't be necessary.
- moon2 7y agoI like the Brave Browser. It's based on chrome but it allows you to control which 3rd party scripts you want to load and other privacy related stuff.
- NikolaNovak 7y agoQuestion - how do they compare to "Cookie Autodelete" extension? I recently reformatted, switched to Firefox, and installed Multi-Containers, Auto-Delete, and uBlock Origins; open to suggestions on what other robust, stable, mainstreams extensions I should try :) Thx!
- nerdponx 7y agoYou'll also want an addon to clear "local storage" and "session storage", which is basically a shadow database where trackers can store identifiers.
- NikolaNovak 7y agoThanks! Any particular ones to recommend? "Cookie AutoDelete" extension does have a "LocalStorage Cleanup" option, but it looks to be somewhat experimental and temperamental...
- kevin_thibedeau 7y agoDecentraleyes to defeat CDN tracking. Random user agent to make fingerprinting harder.
- jmngomes 7y agouBlock Origin goes a long way to mitigating such behaviours: https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/ https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/ But I agree that this level of privacy invasion should be illegal.