I really find it amusing that you think you're making some kind of clever incisive point, but you apparently can't tell the difference between: (1) a candidate

I really find it amusing that you think you're making some kind of clever incisive point, but you apparently can't tell the difference between: (1) a candidate who said a loss for him meant the system was rigged vs a candidate who, in the end, actually conceded the election (2) refusing to accept the outcome of the election vs acknowledging the outcome while believing a different system would produce better results (3) a post that's about the limits of state ability to control EC votes vs a discussion that's about certain forms of structural countermajoritarianism