4 ms·

This is feature that is/was present in other applications, such as ICQ and talkd.

cl0ckt0wer 7y ago
And it's awful. Typing stuff makes me think about it, and I change it constantly. Then you end up having people change thoughts mid sentence when they see what another person has started typing in response to what they haven't even finished yet. It's like having everyone talk at once.
- josephg 7y ago
  Apparently it wasn’t everyone cup of tea but personally I loved it. It makes for a different sort of conversation - more live than the asynchronous back and forth messaging of most apps today. You can often reply to someone while they’re typing their message - and if you guess right they can stop typing and move on to read / reply to your response in turn. I’m not sure how well it works in groups but 1-on-1 it feels more like a phone call than a messaging app; except it’s over text, it seamlessly transitions to offline asynchronous messaging if someone isn’t there and you can both “talk” (type) at the same time.
  - Debugreality 7y ago
    Just make it an option duh!
    - elcomet 7y ago
      But it was an option wasn't it? You could write in draft mode I think, and people couldn't see the result
- richrichardsson 7y ago
  When I'm annoyed with something I've received on any given platform, I find it cathartic to type out a really sarcastic/vicious response to then just delete it all and reply with something a bit more balanced/respectful. Live updates make that impossible.
DonHopkins 7y ago
ITS had :UNTALK (around 1982) https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/41180/AI_WP_235.pdf https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/41180/AI_WP_2... >Another useful comlink program is UNTALK. UNTALK is similar to TALK but does not work across machines. However, on a display terminal, UNTALK splits the screen horizontally and allows the two people to type at the same time on their part of the screen.

And it's awful. Typing stuff makes me think about it, and I change it constantly. Then you end up having people change thoughts mid sentence when they see what another person has started typing in response to what they haven't even finished yet. It's like having everyone talk at once.

josephg 7y ago
Apparently it wasn’t everyone cup of tea but personally I loved it. It makes for a different sort of conversation - more live than the asynchronous back and forth messaging of most apps today. You can often reply to someone while they’re typing their message - and if you guess right they can stop typing and move on to read / reply to your response in turn. I’m not sure how well it works in groups but 1-on-1 it feels more like a phone call than a messaging app; except it’s over text, it seamlessly transitions to offline asynchronous messaging if someone isn’t there and you can both “talk” (type) at the same time.
- Debugreality 7y ago
  Just make it an option duh!
  - elcomet 7y ago
    But it was an option wasn't it? You could write in draft mode I think, and people couldn't see the result
richrichardsson 7y ago
When I'm annoyed with something I've received on any given platform, I find it cathartic to type out a really sarcastic/vicious response to then just delete it all and reply with something a bit more balanced/respectful. Live updates make that impossible.

DonHopkins 7y ago

ITS had :UNTALK (around 1982) https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/41180/AI_WP_235.pdf https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/41180/AI_WP_2... >Another useful comlink program is UNTALK. UNTALK is similar to TALK but does not work across machines. However, on a display terminal, UNTALK splits the screen horizontally and allows the two people to type at the same time on their part of the screen.