3 ms·
It's worth noting that the European Court of Justice has deemed this form of logging to be in violation of human rights, but the danish government continues to
by kawsper 7y ago
It's worth noting that the European Court of Justice has deemed this form of logging to be in violation of human rights, but the danish government continues to do it and our old minister of justice have said they need time to revise the law, there is a group that are fighting it and you can read more about it on their website
: https://ulovliglogning.dk/en/ https://ulovliglogning.dk/en/
- toxik 7y agoI thought this was really well articulated, goes for all mass surveillance: > But why? > You might not think that your secrets are worth keeping, but with enough data, everyone’s a suspect. Maybe you’ve sent a Merry Christmas text to the suspect of an ongoing investigation? Maybe you’ve googled “manure” the week before a homemade bomb is found? > Maybe you’re the only person with a mobile phone that’s been near the scene of a crime, and maybe you’d just bought binliners. Mass surveillance flips the burden of proof. Your movements are recorded and can be used against you, but not in your defense. You might have left your phone at home on purpose.
- kmlx 7y ago> but not in your defense why not in my defence? i mean, my smartphone already knows everything about me, so why not use it for my defence?
- toxik 7y agoThat’s not how mass surveillance works, you don’t have access to the same information, and you don’t even know what information there is to even request in the first place. It’s asymmetrical.