"Again: the present situation isn't bombers. It's missiles." Who's talking about the present situation? The OP was comparing the use of nuclear weapons against

"Again: the present situation isn't bombers. It's missiles." Who's talking about the present situation? The OP was comparing the use of nuclear weapons against the Japanese to the use of conventional weapons against the Japanese in the same war. The bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima are sometimes treated as being qualitatively different from the firebombings of other cities because of the use of nuclear bombs and the OP was disagreeing with that sentiment. Obviously WWII era bombers don't compare with modern ICBMs but no one was saying otherwise.