4 ms·
I understand where this is coming from, and it's definitely from a good place, but honestly I think the solution is a bit naive. Developers are not going to be
by jaboutboul 7y ago
I understand where this is coming from, and it's definitely from a good place, but honestly I think the solution is a bit naive.
Developers are not going to be able to sustain themselves by simply having their software connected to a package manager that charges them when they install a package. You might as well just sell proprietary software at that point.
We as a community need to be look at solutions like Tidelift [1] that will draw in real, serious and interested ENTERPRISE customers. That is where the revenue will come from and that it what will make it viable enough as a long term solution for both the developers AND consumers of FOSS.
Note: I am in now way affialiated with tidelift other than thinking they are smart dudes who are approaching this very pressing issue correctly.
[1] https://tidelift.com/ https://tidelift.com/
- aviaviavi 7y agoScarf also aims to help developers sell open source software to enterprises. The idea of leveraging telemetry by default in exchange for payments specifically targets companies, who can certainly pay for that use case. An issue with Tidelift is that it's more for libraries, but CLI tools are not necessarily included in your project's manifest that Tidelift would see. Tidelift and Scarf can both help open source devs from different angles.