4 ms·
Atom was created for the netbook market, where the target for low power consumption was significantly higher than it was for smartphones and from that tablets.
by ergo98 16y ago
Atom was created for the netbook market, where the target for low power consumption was significantly higher than it was for smartphones and from that tablets.
How many netbooks shipped with ARM? Atom did what was necessary to win that race, even if it wasn't prepared for the subsequent very low power device explosion. The Atom chips themselves are actually remarkably efficient -- with a TDP down to 0.65W for some models, well in the ARM territory -- but Intel never bothered to make efficient supporting circuitry, while failing to full incorporate it into a SoC.
ARM is improving dramatically because it became a critical field with some low hanging advances that were possible. The pace of innovation is impressive, but it has slowed dramatically in the past year -- recall that the Tegra 2 was demoed over a year ago. Today, the high point of the ARM ecosystem is still the Tegra 2. People today are doing the sort of naive extrapolation that we've seen over and over again.
- ippisl 16y agoIntel did bother to make ATOM soc's. They enabled other companies do an ATOM soc using 3rd party fab. nobody took them on their offer. At the same time , they did there own SOC's. for example the CE4100 ,which is especially fitted for digital tv's and includes graphics(powervr) + memory controller + dsp + hd decode on chip. It has took the place of tegra in the boxee box, because the tegra wasn't able to decode high profile H.264 HD streams.pretty disappointing for the tegra after all the hype. But still , the power consumption is high : 11.2W for the boxee box(it's common for streamers to have half that). but intel claims it hadn't done sleep mode on the ce4100. Edit: sony will also use the ce4XXX(sodaville) for tv's.