I'm going to assume you are posting in good faith but to give you an honest answer I have a hard time engaging with posts like this because it reads like you've

I'm going to assume you are posting in good faith but to give you an honest answer I have a hard time engaging with posts like this because it reads like you've done no work to inform yourself. > I'd just like to know, in 10 years from now, if carbon emissions were at 19th century level, what would be the temperature be? and at our current rate of carbon emission what will the temperature be? With what degree of accuracy will the figure hold up to? People have written literally thousands of pages that would answer this question. There are hundreds of pages that give a more accessible overview of the research. It would take you less than a minute to start reading some of this Five years ago when questions like this popped up I would dutifully take the 10 minutes to pull together some links that directly addressed the question. > The onus is on people who believe the climate is changing to prove it I don't disagree. But once the people who believe the climate is changing have written millions of words explaining what they believe is happening, surely there is some onus on internetposterN to read some of that before dismissing the entirety of the enterprise by raising a few questions