3 ms·
That’s an absurd statement and reeks of the most vile arrogance. I’m so confused, do you honestly and in good faith make a statement like that? Do you not unde
by arrrg 7y ago
That’s an absurd statement and reeks of the most vile arrogance.
I’m so confused, do you honestly and in good faith make a statement like that? Do you not understand the disastrous social and political implications of approaching the problem like that? Do you not understand that fairness is central to this problem because a coordinated global effort is necessary and there is no fascist world police and hopefully never will be so we are dependent on convincing everyone and fairness is obviously central to this?
Humans care about per capita emissions because that’s one of the only ways to make this fair and we need to make this fair or else we will convince no one.
You are solving a social/political problem. Arrogant statements like yours won’t.
- s_y_n_t_a_x 7y agoYou won't make a difference until you stop the over population. The biggest contributor is simply being born.
- nabnob 7y agoSince the United States has one of the highest energy usage rates per capita, do you mean tackling overpopulation in the United States?
- s_y_n_t_a_x 7y agoThe US has 330 million people, China has nearly 1.5 billion. No I think the US is just fine. Per capita only matters if you're okay ignoring the bulk of the problem.