4 ms·
Original study here: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135419301794 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004313541... It con
by blue_devil 7y ago
Original study here: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135419301794 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004313541...
It concludes that of the 50 studies they reviewed only 4 were of sufficient quality to draw conclusions. So, the study concluded
>>We conclude that more high quality data is needed on the occurrence of microplastics in drinking water, to better understand potential exposure and to inform human health risk assessments.
How does this translate to "microplastics not harmful"?
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]