Evidence of paper ballots being tampered with, in my opinion, is a very useful/good thing. It means it’s possible to get caught. As I’ve mentioned in a previou

Evidence of paper ballots being tampered with, in my opinion, is a very useful/good thing. It means it’s possible to get caught. As I’ve mentioned in a previous comment: This is survivorship bias. Instead: 1. Assume that there are enough high-powered actors to want to rig an election 2. Note that confirmed case of a rigged election happens through paper absentee ballots 3. Note that there are very few known cases of a rigged election happening through electronic voting machines. 4. One probable conclusion is that election rigging is possible and undetectable through electronic voting machines.