5 ms·
On the contrary, you've just put words in my mouth because you've done some logical leaps in your head that just took you away from reality. In reality, if you
by mffnbs 7y ago
On the contrary, you've just put words in my mouth because you've done some logical leaps in your head that just took you away from reality.
In reality, if you want to make an assertion and have other people convinced of your argument, then your obligation is to provide all the facts. Given that, you cannot simply take the inverse hypothetical situation where election fraud is just assumed and use that to form your argument. We still have yet to establish that fraud is happening. So why would we want to suppress votes to prevent something that doesn't happen?
- wang_li 7y agoI'm not going to debate you after you accuse me of wanting to disenfranchise voters. Honestly, you should be banned from the site. It is however factual that fraud happens. People go to jail every election cycle.
- mffnbs 7y agoI've already been banned from reddit, please don't ban me from this site. How will I debate the merits of plastic making trans people gay, men's rights, programming languages that were created before 1990, startups that have clear business value but discussing how they don't have value to a small subset of society, overvalued IPOs, etc, etc etc. It is not factual that fraud happens on a scale the warrants disenfranchising voters. If you advocate for disenfranchising voters without providing any sort of argument that legitimizes doing so, then yes, I absolutely am accusing you of wanting to disenfranchise voters for no reason other than to fear monger. You're the TSA of airport security. The WMDs of war. The daily weather of climate change. The fucking pizza of sex trafficking. You should be banned from this site for spreading this fucking nonsense.