3 ms·
Since stdlib and compiler releases are tightly coordinated, that shouldn't be a problem, no?
by raphlinus 7y ago
Since stdlib and compiler releases are tightly coordinated, that shouldn't be a problem, no?
- anp 7y agoHow do you accommodate breaking changes to the public interface of std?
- raphlinus 7y agoRight, I see your point here. There are non-trivial issues that need to be worked out, which I'm sure is one reason it's not in the library yet. Another (mentioned elsewhere) is that it takes time to converge on what a good API might look like.
- heavenlyblue 7y agoWell, with non-std I can always downgrade or upgrade the library. With std I am bounded by the current language version.
- snovv_crash 7y agoYou can only down or upgrade if uour dependencies don't depend on it too. Having a defacto standard library has more issues IMO than a real standard library.
- est31 7y agoMy core argument is that libraries usually do need breaking changes, and including them into std turns them into zombies that can never be removed. I think python has issues with this. And the syn example that I pointed out above shows that Rust isn't immune from this either.