4 ms·
Sure, California's votes may mean less on a per capita basis, but if you're asserting that California is under-represented compared to Wyoming on a national bas
by theli0nheart 7y ago
Sure, California's votes may mean less on a per capita basis, but if you're asserting that California is under-represented compared to Wyoming on a national basis, you're going to have to give some supporting evidence there. That's a pretty wild claim.
- cj 7y ago> supporting evidence Read higher up in the thread: > For example, a vote in Wyoming counts 3.6 times more than a vote in California.[1]