> I don't think this will survive constitutional challenge, because it is not the voters of the state who are deciding how the state's electors are decided. Is

> I don't think this will survive constitutional challenge, because it is not the voters of the state who are deciding how the state's electors are decided. Is this US constitutional law or Nevada constitutional law that I'm not familiar with? There's no law I'm familiar with against faithless electors and Ray v. Blair made it clear that states are allowed to exclude electors if they won't pledge their support a certain way. Finally, article 2 clause 2 of the US constitution gives fairly broad leeway on how states assign their electors. I could be mistaken though. Outside observers from other countries often are.