4 ms·
That logic doesn't work. It can be applied in reverse to invalidate your point: Why would California have joined a union of states where their votes mean 1/4 o
by cj 7y ago
That logic doesn't work. It can be applied in reverse to invalidate your point:
Why would California have joined a union of states where their votes mean 1/4 of Wyoming's?
- theli0nheart 7y agoSure, California's votes may mean less on a per capita basis, but if you're asserting that California is under-represented compared to Wyoming on a national basis, you're going to have to give some supporting evidence there. That's a pretty wild claim.
- cj 7y ago> supporting evidence Read higher up in the thread: > For example, a vote in Wyoming counts 3.6 times more than a vote in California.[1]