From the article: "Given that women have been the majority of the undergraduate student body in many countries for the last three decades, one can no longer arg

From the article: "Given that women have been the majority of the undergraduate student body in many countries for the last three decades, one can no longer argue that equality can be achieved by simply waiting for young female scholars to emerge at the end of the academic “pipeline." Isn't having less men as undergrads and grads, sexism as well? This time against men? If the principle being proposed by the author of the article, is that "not having equal outcomes is sexism", then one should expect the ones demanding that principle, to extend it to every situation, not only to the situations that suit their personal ideology. It is a question of basic coherence, really.