3 ms·

4K at 13”? I wonder who would need (or even want) that.

• enriquto 7y ago
  i'd pay extra for a version with large pixels and much longer battery life
  • apk-d 7y ago
    I'd pay extra for a version with a taller screen. I don't understand why there's next to no market for laptops that aren't 16:9
    • enriquto 7y ago
      This! I fight against this craziness by mocking "wide" screens as being "short".
    • stetrain 7y ago
      These are 16:10 "The display panels feature a 1920×1200 or 3840×2400 resolution" However 3:2 would be nice, like the Surface Laptop.
  • psychrometer 7y ago
    You can pay less by buying the version with the 1920x1200 screen.
  • deleted 7y ago
    [deleted]
• nine_k 7y ago
  I would! I like a ton of text on my screen.