I believe there are logical inference errors in the paper. I'll mention one example: "Given that women have been the majority of the undergraduate student body

I believe there are logical inference errors in the paper. I'll mention one example: "Given that women have been the majority of the undergraduate student body in many countries for the last three decades, one can no longer argue that equality can be achieved by simply waiting for young female scholars to emerge at the end of the academic “pipeline.” " The author should familiarize themselves with Simpson's paradox*. This maps almost directly onto the classic UC Berkley case in the Wikipedia article. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simpson%27s_paradox https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simpson%27s_paradox