3 ms·
This article has a lot of wrong or otherwise misleading information. One I haven't noticed in the comments so far is that the author refers to Chromium as being
by unknown2374 7y ago
This article has a lot of wrong or otherwise misleading information. One I haven't noticed in the comments so far is that the author refers to Chromium as being free and open-source. It isn't [0]. It downloads more Google account and activity tracking related blobs than ever when building the code as well.
While I agree with the gist of the article, this is worth pointing out since a lot of people do use Chromium because it is advertised this way, thinking that somehow they are not playing into the Chrome/Google monopoly. For those interested, there is an alternative build without all the google stuff baked in: https://github.com/Eloston/ungoogled-chromium https://github.com/Eloston/ungoogled-chromium
[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9724409 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9724409
- lioeters 7y agoI remember seeing an article a few months ago, that Microsoft removed 51 Google services from Chromium while they transitioned Edge to it. https://imgur.com/Szwkb0O https://imgur.com/Szwkb0O That list helps to show how Chromium is far from the open-source ideal.