27 ms·

As a follow-up to the Harvard connections that remain under-scrutinized, here’s an alarming tweet from a Caltech professor: ‘Around 2007 I attended a dinner at

As a follow-up to the Harvard connections that remain under-scrutinized, here’s an alarming tweet from a Caltech professor: ‘Around 2007 I attended a dinner at @Harvard during which someone told me about a professor who was flying to New York, and to some island, to visit a millionaire. With that millionaire, I was told, he was raping girls. "Everybody knows" they said..‘ https://twitter.com/lpachter/status/1163608101443928064?s=21 https://twitter.com/lpachter/status/1163608101443928064?s=21

selimthegrim 7y ago
Pachter has a tendency to libelous-seeming rhetoric but I can't imagine he wouldn't testify if subpoenaed, even over hearsay.
goatinaboat 7y ago
he was raping girls. "Everybody knows" they said Again with the parallels to Harvey Weinstein. All the happy, smiling people photographed with him also scrambled to distance themselves once the allegations reached a critical mass, but they all knew all along what he was. And as long as it suited their interests they were perfectly willing to look the other way.
- skrebbel 7y ago
  Really? How would they know? I'm asking sincerely, I've not deeply read into this (or the Epstein story). I just always suspected that rich and influential people would generally be able to keep secrets under wraps. I guess I just think it's kind of odd to assume that everyone who ever posed on a photo with Weinstein knew he was a rapist. That's quite a far stretch of "guilty by association"
  - AareyBaba 7y ago
    You can read deeply here https://www.miamiherald.com/topics/jeffrey-epstein https://www.miamiherald.com/topics/jeffrey-epstein
patrec 7y ago
If regular child rape trips of peers and colleagues really are casual dinner party conversation topics at top academic institutions like Harvard and common knowledge no one bothers to do anything about, one begins to wonder what else our betters are up to in broad daylight.
- dredmorbius 7y ago
  This rapidly veers into the realm of gross speculation and conspiracy theory. But the prospect that large elements of the ruling establishment (business, government, academic, possibly legal, certainly clerical) are kompromat, then the data custodian holding such information has immense power. Oddly enough, this is largely the argument which was used from the 19th century through the 1990s to bar Communists and homosexuals from government and military service, and most privileged positions in business. It now seems to have hit the cis hetero community, hard. There may need to be a widespread opening of books. Because if "they" have it -- where "they" is whatever adversarial power or authority you care to name might be, it's pretty certain that Home Team also have a strong idea of the same facts, though are less disposed to utilise them, generally. This also raises an interesting characteristic of information and pervasive surveillance. It's already beyond bad for the ordinary public who can be scammed, harrassed, defrauded, or coerced through legal or business threats. There's little reason to think that anyone who is in a position power is immune, and very probable that they're even more subject to such surveillance, if not outright baiting. And whilst I've my own theories over which political stripes are more involved in this, at least presently, I've got a very strong suspicion that none can claim to be fully comprised of innocents. Which could explain numerous elements of both oddly cooperative behaviour and failure to respond. Barbed wire is effective without being lethal, through knowledge of repeated pain.
paggle 7y ago
And what did this Caltech professor do about it? Or even try to do?

selimthegrim 7y ago

Pachter has a tendency to libelous-seeming rhetoric but I can't imagine he wouldn't testify if subpoenaed, even over hearsay.

goatinaboat 7y ago

he was raping girls. "Everybody knows" they said Again with the parallels to Harvey Weinstein. All the happy, smiling people photographed with him also scrambled to distance themselves once the allegations reached a critical mass, but they all knew all along what he was. And as long as it suited their interests they were perfectly willing to look the other way.

skrebbel 7y ago
Really? How would they know? I'm asking sincerely, I've not deeply read into this (or the Epstein story). I just always suspected that rich and influential people would generally be able to keep secrets under wraps. I guess I just think it's kind of odd to assume that everyone who ever posed on a photo with Weinstein knew he was a rapist. That's quite a far stretch of "guilty by association"
- AareyBaba 7y ago
  You can read deeply here https://www.miamiherald.com/topics/jeffrey-epstein https://www.miamiherald.com/topics/jeffrey-epstein

patrec 7y ago

If regular child rape trips of peers and colleagues really are casual dinner party conversation topics at top academic institutions like Harvard and common knowledge no one bothers to do anything about, one begins to wonder what else our betters are up to in broad daylight.

dredmorbius 7y ago
This rapidly veers into the realm of gross speculation and conspiracy theory. But the prospect that large elements of the ruling establishment (business, government, academic, possibly legal, certainly clerical) are kompromat, then the data custodian holding such information has immense power. Oddly enough, this is largely the argument which was used from the 19th century through the 1990s to bar Communists and homosexuals from government and military service, and most privileged positions in business. It now seems to have hit the cis hetero community, hard. There may need to be a widespread opening of books. Because if "they" have it -- where "they" is whatever adversarial power or authority you care to name might be, it's pretty certain that Home Team also have a strong idea of the same facts, though are less disposed to utilise them, generally. This also raises an interesting characteristic of information and pervasive surveillance. It's already beyond bad for the ordinary public who can be scammed, harrassed, defrauded, or coerced through legal or business threats. There's little reason to think that anyone who is in a position power is immune, and very probable that they're even more subject to such surveillance, if not outright baiting. And whilst I've my own theories over which political stripes are more involved in this, at least presently, I've got a very strong suspicion that none can claim to be fully comprised of innocents. Which could explain numerous elements of both oddly cooperative behaviour and failure to respond. Barbed wire is effective without being lethal, through knowledge of repeated pain.

paggle 7y ago

And what did this Caltech professor do about it? Or even try to do?