3 ms·

It's a short list, and some "inventions" are dubious at best. OLPC for instance.

• nostrademons 7y ago
  Those were the ones I've heard of - the actual list is quite a bit longer, but includes a lot of B2B technologies in industries I don't care about. That's pretty good for an organization with a budget of $75M and a permanent staff of 80. I'd be hard-pressed to think of an organization of similar size that's had greater impact - maybe YCombinator or Stanford's CS department. Bell Labs was orders of magnitude bigger - in their 1970s heyday they had 24,000 employees and a budget of around $6B in today's money.
  • pvg 7y ago
    Bell Labs can just show up in this competition, say 'the transistor', drop the mic and walk out. Media Lab has always been, by design, about outreach and demos and fundraising as much as (if not more than?) about research. Comparing it to real research institutions on the basis of research is never going to come out flattering.
  • skinnymuch 7y ago
    Wasn’t Bell Labs innovating before that? Presumably with a smaller budget and smaller head count? Maybe still bigger than Media Lab. But if Bell Labs did some of their impressive stuff at say 5x budget and head count of Media Lab (using only inflation to do budget differences also prob will lead to an uneven comparison that isn’t fair. Not sure which way it would swing though). Then Bell Labs id think would still take the cake. EDIT: Bell Labs started out with 4K employees so it was always an order of magnitude bigger. Maybe Media Lab is the biggest innovator for its size. I don’t know if that means much though if it is. Bell Labs gets brought up probably because their influence and what they’ve done far far exceeds the budget and head count advantage.
• snowwrestler 7y ago
  The parent tweet said "innovations" which is not the same thing as "inventions," the word you used.