Don't have any substantial amount of important data between 0.45 and 0.55? The biggest tree is in that range! How is that not low-contrast detail in the mid-ran

Don't have any substantial amount of important data between 0.45 and 0.55? The biggest tree is in that range! How is that not low-contrast detail in the mid-range? https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-H-1I69V29VM/XVWeDrO7EPI/AAAAAAAAEdI/rc4kcJYaiNkTgazt-P1tJ7xCgeXBTuNFgCLcBGAs/s1600/image31.png https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-H-1I69V29VM/XVWeDrO7EPI/AAAAAAAAE... https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-6zVTINtwP60/XVWeKMWavuI/AAAAAAAAEdM/VYew83Y03bI37wZDCXmqYaduNbLWAbSawCLcBGAs/s1600/image22.png https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-6zVTINtwP60/XVWeKMWavuI/AAAAAAAAE... Look at the images again. 0.45 to 0.55 is green. Do the leaves on the front of the closest tree actually look harder to distinguish in Turbo than in Inferno? It doesn't matter which function you apply to your data beforehand, it won't change that Turbo has more distinguishable steps than Viridis/Inferno. Turbo goes red-yellow-green-blue-black, Viridis goes yellow-green-black. Of course Turbo will be able to show more contrast.