I'm confused. The title of this article isn't at all supported by its content. The entire thing can be summarized as: > Google rolled out a new feature that al

I'm confused. The title of this article isn't at all supported by its content. The entire thing can be summarized as: > Google rolled out a new feature that allows AMP to use server-side rendering (SSR), boosting performance for sites that adopt the technology across their entire domain. Followed by a dozen paragraphs arguing why AMP is bad, with no further mention of server side rendering or why it "shows how [AMP] can infiltrate every corner of the internet". Is there anything new here, or is this just another rehash of the same arguments we've been having about AMP since the day it was released?