4 ms·
I totally agree. Hard not to think about Edward Tufte when this comes up: "In color maps, use a single hue, Don't use up the entire color spectrum, or even all
by plufz 7y ago
I totally agree. Hard not to think about Edward Tufte when this comes up:
"In color maps, use a single hue, Don't use up the entire color spectrum, or even all of a hue's levels. Particularly avoid Roy G. Biv (red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo, violet), the color spectrum of the rainbow. It's good physics, but poor human factors. Like all multi-hue color maps, the non-equidistant hue changes are perceived as especially important contours, which they usually are not. Furthermore, the lighter middle parts of the spectrum are often perceived as the higher values. Finally, one needs to constantly remind oneself which color means high vs. low values. Using a single hue with variations in intensity allows instant interpretation, multiple color maps without ambiguity, and leaves graphical space for layering and separation."
- Terretta 7y ago> “Like all multi-hue color maps, the non-equidistant hue changes are perceived as especially important contours, which they usually are not.” That’s basically the objection this mapping is aiming to address.
- plufz 7y agoYeah, sorry, didn’t want to mess up the quote. But I should have mentioned it, you are of course right!