3 ms·
After a quick Google, I see there are a few. So I change my question to: has anybody used and liked/disliked one of these libraries or a similar one? The main
by msutherl 16y ago
After a quick Google, I see there are a few. So I change my question to: has anybody used and liked/disliked one of these libraries or a similar one?
The main ones I could find were FC++ and FACT:
http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~yannis/fc++/ http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~yannis/fc++/ <http://hci.usask.ca/people/ragu/writings/FunctionalProgrammingInCPP.pdf> http://hci.usask.ca/people/ragu/writings/FunctionalProgrammi...;
http://www.fz-juelich.de/jsc/FACT/Old_Pages/fact_index.html http://www.fz-juelich.de/jsc/FACT/Old_Pages/fact_index.html
http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_45_0/libs/functional/index.html http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_45_0/libs/functional/index.h...
http://okmij.org/ftp/cpp-digest/Functional-Cpp.html http://okmij.org/ftp/cpp-digest/Functional-Cpp.html
or <http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Calling_Haskell_from_C> http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Calling_Haskell_from_C...; :)
- srean 16y agoI have played with FC++ a little bit. Its nice, but if you are used to scheme it will feel verbose. But one cant really complain, C++ wasn't really meant for this.