If by "collective bargaining rights" they don't actually mean "a monopoly on worker representation" then there should be no problem. For most of DollarGeneral'

If by "collective bargaining rights" they don't actually mean "a monopoly on worker representation" then there should be no problem. For most of DollarGeneral's workers, the alternative is not a higher wage (if it were unionized), but unemployment. The "living wage" is a productivity hurdle, it's the message that: "if your productivity is not >X, it's illegal to try to find employment".