4 ms·
Csteubs is correct - there was no implication of foul play in the original post. Typically when there's an article about a business dispute like this, you would
by markrote 7y ago
Csteubs is correct - there was no implication of foul play in the original post. Typically when there's an article about a business dispute like this, you would expect the article to include relevant information about overlapping business interests, so I added that for context.
- reitzensteinm 7y agoLooks like it's too late to delete or edit, but I'm sorry for misinterpreting what you were saying. Looks like I was the irrationally paranoid one, after all :)