3 ms·

I thought the architect was having a problem dealing with anomalies surrounding free will or “choice”, not the lack of understanding for love or hope...but mayb

I thought the architect was having a problem dealing with anomalies surrounding free will or “choice”, not the lack of understanding for love or hope...but maybe I missed something. He did say that the machines had destroyed Zion 5 times already though, or something like that. Maybe that’s where movie 4 will expand.

SketchySeaBeast 7y ago
I guess it was specific love instead of general love that confounded things. From http://www.leesmovieinfo.net/special/MatrixReloadedSpeech1.php http://www.leesmovieinfo.net/special/MatrixReloadedSpeech1.p...: The Architect - It is interesting reading your reactions. Your five predecessors were by design based on a similar predication, a contingent affirmation that was meant to create a profound attachment to the rest of your species, facilitating the function of the one. While the others experienced this in a very general way, your experience is far more specific. Vis-a-vis, love. Images of Trinity fighting the agent from Neo's dream appear on the monitors Neo - Trinity. The Architect - Apropos, she entered the matrix to save your life at the cost of her own. Neo - No! The Architect - Which brings us at last to the moment of truth, wherein the fundamental flaw is ultimately expressed, and the anomaly revealed as both beginning, and end. There are two doors. The door to your right leads to the source, and the salvation of Zion. The door to the left leads back to the matrix, to her, and to the end of your species. As you adequately put, the problem is choice. But we already know what you're going to do, don't we? Already I can see the chain reaction, the chemical precursors that signal the onset of emotion, designed specifically to overwhelm logic, and reason. An emotion that is already blinding you from the simple, and obvious truth: she is going to die, and there is nothing that you can do to stop it.
- kopos 7y ago
  Reading that whole conversation in the voice of the Architect. Goosebumps!

SketchySeaBeast 7y ago

I guess it was specific love instead of general love that confounded things. From http://www.leesmovieinfo.net/special/MatrixReloadedSpeech1.php http://www.leesmovieinfo.net/special/MatrixReloadedSpeech1.p...: The Architect - It is interesting reading your reactions. Your five predecessors were by design based on a similar predication, a contingent affirmation that was meant to create a profound attachment to the rest of your species, facilitating the function of the one. While the others experienced this in a very general way, your experience is far more specific. Vis-a-vis, love. Images of Trinity fighting the agent from Neo's dream appear on the monitors Neo - Trinity. The Architect - Apropos, she entered the matrix to save your life at the cost of her own. Neo - No! The Architect - Which brings us at last to the moment of truth, wherein the fundamental flaw is ultimately expressed, and the anomaly revealed as both beginning, and end. There are two doors. The door to your right leads to the source, and the salvation of Zion. The door to the left leads back to the matrix, to her, and to the end of your species. As you adequately put, the problem is choice. But we already know what you're going to do, don't we? Already I can see the chain reaction, the chemical precursors that signal the onset of emotion, designed specifically to overwhelm logic, and reason. An emotion that is already blinding you from the simple, and obvious truth: she is going to die, and there is nothing that you can do to stop it.

kopos 7y ago
Reading that whole conversation in the voice of the Architect. Goosebumps!