The article seems to be written in very pugilistic and un-objective tone - "sabotage", "Orwellian", "seized on", "fooled", "propaganda", "fearmongering", "regre

The article seems to be written in very pugilistic and un-objective tone - "sabotage", "Orwellian", "seized on", "fooled", "propaganda", "fearmongering", "regressive", etc. It seems that there's some disagreement whether building more light rail in a specific place is good or not, but it's presented as nothing but a nefarious plan by evil Kochs to prop up their evil oil empire. That conspirological approach and a total absence of any real substantial argument on the matter (whether for or against) makes article pretty useless for anybody who would want to understand what actually is going on and what are the arguments for or against those projects.