3 ms·
I'm just speculating, but given that CentOS is (historically) pretty much identical for the most part to RHEL without the high licensing cost, there is little i
by nineteen999 7y ago
I'm just speculating, but given that CentOS is (historically) pretty much identical for the most part to RHEL without the high licensing cost, there is little incentive for Redhat to ensure it is always available in lockstep with RHEL.
They make a lot of money from RHEL licenses so why give a clone of it away on day one of a major release.
- jsjohnst 7y agoThe folks who use CentOS over RHEL wouldn’t likely use RHEL even if CentOS lagged much longer imho. You don’t buy RHEL generally because you want it faster, you buy it because you want the support.
- nineteen999 7y agoExactly. We use Redhat because our contract with our customer explicitly states that there has to be support from the OS vendor in place.