3 ms·

Google were experimenting with voting on results: http://techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-sea

Google were experimenting with voting on results: http://techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-google-experimenting-with-digg-style-voting-on-search-results/ http://techcrunch.com/2007/11/28/straight-out-of-left-field-... Also there is this form for reporting spam sites: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/spamreport https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/spamreport Integrating the above into standard search results would be difficult unless it was restricted to users with a good "karma". That might be possible in our increasingly socially networked world

cosmicray 16y ago
You could also restrict it to people who buy, and sell, on Google Checkout. Putting real money/goods on the table tends to weed out the fake accounts.
CWuestefeld 16y ago
The thing is, the SO scrapers like efreedom aren't spam, strictly speaking. It's just that they clone existing content without adding value, and as such are just noise in the results. Perhaps we need to frame the discussion differently, considering what the searcher wants, rather than "spam-free hits".
- nervechannel 16y ago
  That was my point really. I don't want to see eFreedom hits, I consider them spammy, so I'd like to be able to click-ban them from my results. If Google use that information to gradually adjust their ranking overall, then fair enough -- won't affect me, I can't see them anyway. EDIT: Even if they don't let that affect everyone else's results (because of gaming), then I still don't care, I still don't see the crap in my results ever again.