8 ms·
And that's easily countered by saying "total profits, including subsidiaries."
by MichaelApproved 7y ago
And that's easily countered by saying "total profits, including subsidiaries."
- tick_tock_tick 7y agoEven she wouldn't be stupid enough to try that.
- munk-a 7y agoIndeed, we should all cower in fear to avoid offending the lobbyists.
- hervature 7y agoAnd that's easily countered by having franchises and not subsidiaries
- enraged_camel 7y agoAnd that's easily countered by saying, "total profits, including subsidiaries and franchises." See, we can play this game all day. The fundamental point is this: just because people might break a law (directly or in spirit) is not an argument against having said law.