2 ms·
No one would argue that isn't consistent success at the highest levels of running. >If you can't understand that breaking a record by 10 hours means that the p
by throwaway_law 7y ago
No one would argue that isn't consistent success at the highest levels of running.
>If you can't understand that breaking a record by 10 hours means that the previous record was shit, then I don't how to help you understand that.
I get it you don't like women, and their success threatens you and your identity. What were you saying about weirdo agenda? You can't seem to acknowledge the few hundred men who have been unable to break her record (or come anywhere close for that matter).
>Case closed, or at least it would be with anyone who actually runs ultras, or runs at all.
I look forward to watching you compete against her in a future Ultra and showing us all how she is shit and her records are shit. In fact, as your accusing me of using a throwaway, tell us all your real name and these Ultra's you have competed in and lets see if we can find a single race where a women didn't beat you.
- dang 7y agoWould you please follow the site guidelines (https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html) when posting here? You've been breaking them with bits like these: > I get it you don't like women, and their success threatens you and your identity > You really seem obsessed with penises > you can call them niche races if it helps your ego We ban accounts that make a habit of posting in the flamewar style, so please edit such swipes out of your comments here, even if another commenter is wrong or annoying. They degrade discussion badly—it's notable how much worse this comment is than where things started out—and I'm sure you can make your substantive points without them.