4 ms·
'The off-Facebook activity setting isn't currently available to you right now.' Smart, announcing it without it being usable, so when it's silently rolled out
by high_derivative 7y ago
'The off-Facebook activity setting isn't currently available to you right now.'
Smart, announcing it without it being usable, so when it's silently rolled out later people will have forgotten about it. Never change, FB.
- moneil971 7y agoIt’s rolled out in Ireland, South Korea and Spain to start, more countries are coming soon.
- high_derivative 7y agoSorry, but my point stands. In Facebook's case, there is absolutely zero reason to assume good intentions, give the benefit of the doubt, have general good-will, or believe its employees regarding privacy aims.
- la_barba 7y agoWhich social media company would you believe regarding privacy?
- chillydawg 7y agoNone, obviously.
- inflatableDodo 7y agoThe Masons.
- fghtr 7y agoPurism: https://librem.one/ https://librem.one/
- rtkwe 7y agoAny social with a monthly fee is not going to hit the same network criticality that makes Facebook reign supreme. Attracting people to a new service is hard enough tell them it'll cost 50$ a year and it's hopeless.
- gregknicholson 7y agoThe network is not the same thing as the provider. Anyone can use Mastodon for free, so Purism is part of a larger network than just Purism.
- saagarjha 7y agoY Combinator?
- nafey 7y agoNothing such as absolute trust. It has to be a relative comparison. For me it is Apple, Google, Facebook in that order.
- wpietri 7y agoAny social media company whose business isn't renting your eyeballs to the highest bidder.
- reroute1 7y agoIt doesn't stand in those countries obviously it is available there. There is no reason to assume bad intentions either and your first statement was just a lot of assumptions and already has been corrected for being not completely true.
- moju 7y agoNot working in Ireland at the moment. Reactivated my account to check.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]