3 ms·
Zero-trust architecture seem nice idea, and one you can implement when you’re Google and probably spend more on security than the gross revenue of most other co
by nixgeek 7y ago
Zero-trust architecture seem nice idea, and one you can implement when you’re Google and probably spend more on security than the gross revenue of most other companies reading your whitepaper.
I think the notion most infrastructure is not publicly addressed is prevalent, even in Google, i.e. you can’t SSH to the hypervisor hosting customer instances in GCP directly, it doesn’t have SSH sat on the public internet.
Public addresses are readily available on the secondary market but a /12 probably runs somewhere around $20MM.
Charging for IPv4 seems like a move designed to make all the smallest customers who care about $3/mo leave, GCP ends up with less customers and ARPU goes up probably significantly.