4 ms·
Mercurial was a bit slow in the first years. It's still probably slower for huge repos (I havn't checked), but I doubt it will bother you much nowadays. I use
by gnud 7y ago
Mercurial was a bit slow in the first years.
It's still probably slower for huge repos (I havn't checked), but I doubt it will bother you much nowadays.
I used Hg before Git professionally, because when they were both new, Hg had _much_ better Windows support.