3 ms·
And when you want to change from AWS, you are completely locked in, no?
by collyw 7y ago
And when you want to change from AWS, you are completely locked in, no?
- octopoc 7y agoIf you use one of the open serverless frameworks such as OpenFaaS (which is what this article is about) then no you're not locked in. BTW my team has investigated OpenFaaS to be able to share code between the cloud and local installations, and if we do OpenFaaS looks promising. The architecture is well documented and makes sense.
- windexh8er 7y agoUsing OpenFaaS on AWS doesn't exactly alleviate all of the lock-in. It locks you in to a larger spend. This is because OpenFaaS is heavily dependent on, generally, a k8s cluster that is going to be chewing through bill time 24/7. I think that's the trade-off: you pay to not be locked into Lambda. Personally I don't think that's a bad thing, but I've seen plenty of times where customers would balk because their initial serverless trials cost $5, $10, $15 a month but when running something that would be better for them longer term it would initially be 4-8x that in opex. So they go the "easier" (cheaper) path and build everything around that lock-in tooling.
- omnimus 7y agoI think serverless framework and openfass are trying to make it so its not so locked. But yes you are locked with aws.