3 ms·
If internet was 50 of that you would have to be subscribed to 5 of these to pay that much. That seems like way more than I've ever had since cord cutting. On to
by coding123 7y ago
If internet was 50 of that you would have to be subscribed to 5 of these to pay that much. That seems like way more than I've ever had since cord cutting. On top of that it's highly likely people will drop one or two a lot more easily when their current fav show is done.
- nickthegreek 7y agoI think there is a large portion of people who already have netflix and a streaming music service. A good portion of those already have Prime as well. I'd imagine most cord cutters would be comfortable doing 2 video+1 music. I do $15 for netflix (4k, allows 4 streams. mom & bro use extra). I use Youtube Premium as it provides the best value to me (access to google play music & ad-free youtube/originals). That is another $11. I'd love to have CBS All-Access but thats not happening just for Star Trek. Maybe they will be changing their service after the CBS/Viacom merger which would give them a HUGE back catalog of good snack content to appease subscribers as they grow their originals. The new disney+ bundle (with Hulu ad supported, and espn is $15 i think). Unbundle is $7. Then you have HBO Max coming which should be AT LEAST $15 (the current price of HBO go). I'd bet there will be a new crackdown on account sharing with these services to maximize subscriber count. Piracy is going to be coming back in a big way. Access to a friends PLEX account is gonna be the new happiness.