5 ms·
Being “very good at marketing” also doesn’t mean “honest at marketing”. I too would prefer it if every professional had the same moral compass you and I have;
by pushpop 7y ago
Being “very good at marketing” also doesn’t mean “honest at marketing”.
I too would prefer it if every professional had the same moral compass you and I have; but that is a separate issue. Hence why people can be both successful and arguably immoral.
- jacquesm 7y agoMarketing is pretty much dishonest by definition.
- TomMarius 7y agoIt's not. There is a commercial for a hospital next to my house. On it is a photo of one of their best doctors (very well known and respected), saying "I work for this hospital because they enable my success". 100% honest. I wouldn't know he works at that hospital without that commercial and would never visit him without it. I am thankful.
- tedk-42 7y agoAhahaha brilliant sarcastic post
- TomMarius 7y agoNot at all, just don't assume that everyone lives in the USA
- tsimionescu 7y agoThat is actually a good example of deceptive marketing. It happens that you want to see this doctor, so you don't notice th problem: you now have an association in your mind between the reputation of the doctor you know and respect and the hospital itself. You have no idea if other doctors for other specialties are comparable in skill. You have no idea if the hospital charges exaggerated prices, how their services are in general etc - the commercial is simply meant to appeal to your positive emotions about this particular doctor. And they didn't even have to lie about anything to obtain the effect.
- TomMarius 7y agoI don't live in a healthcare system where any of this matters. I live in a universal healthcare (insurance) country. I can go to any hospital and any doctor "for free" at any time. I don't care about their other doctors in the slightest, I have my list of trustable doctors and where they work based on personal merit. I always pre-check my doctors on the internet before I visit them. I don't even know the names of the hospitals I visit, to be honest (often it's just town name anyways). However most often the hospital nearest to me is the one I visit because the standard of care is good enough - now I will go a little (2 km) further to visit this one. I wouldn't go more than 5 km out of my way to visit a doctor (obvious exceptions apply).
- vertex-four 7y agoI'm confused - you knew of this doctor, you knew you wanted to see him, but for some reason you couldn't use google to work out where he works?
- TomMarius 7y agoWhere I live (Czech Republic) we don't do healthcare like that. We often go to the one available at the hospital of our choice (often the nearest one) or the one our practician recommends. We don't travel long distances to visit doctors. Now that he works near me (less than 5 km out of my way), I will switch my hospital of choice - if I didn't know, I wouldn't.
- ferzul 7y agowell, surely the definition is something like telling the market a product exists and/or creating that market. which I think is quite reasonable. it's the stuff people do and call it marketing and advertising that is dishonest - trying to make people want something despite it not being in their best interest. once upon a time, I think we trusted businesses because we saw most business was honest. and now much less so, since we see most business is dishonest now.
- tremon 7y agoThis isn't true, doing good product placement or publishing accurate test results is also marketing but is not dishonest. Granted, modern marketing is rarely applied this way so in practice almost all marketing is dishonest, but that's not what "by definition" means.
- dTal 7y agoI don't know what "good" product placement is, but selectively publishing accurate test results only if they support your cause is dishonest, yes. And if you have no demonstrated conflict of interest and commit to publishing your results regardless of what they say, then that is not "marketing" - it's "research". Marketing is dishonest "by definition", because its purpose is to persuade, not inform.
- ajscanlan 7y agoIs persuasion dishonest by definition?
- dTal 7y agoGood point. Not necessarily. But persuasion of something you do not yourself believe is dishonest, and persuasion masquerading as neutral information is dishonest. Really the question is - whose interest are you purporting to serve by communicating with me? Yours, or mine? And whose interest are you actually serving?
- pushpop 7y agoNot really. It’s just the memorable examples that are. An advert in your local paper saying “Handyman Bob, ${phonenumber}” is fine. However once you start to scale things the rewards for dishonesty become greater (as does your budget to pay for experienced professionals who understand which marketing tricks work).