3 ms·
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks like you're using (rumored) 2009 income numbers with the Jan. 2011 valuation in your calculation. Income surely would have
by nano81 16y ago
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks like you're using (rumored) 2009 income numbers with the Jan. 2011 valuation in your calculation. Income surely would have changed since then.
- michaelchisari 16y agoYes, that's true. Assuming 2009's valuation of 25 billion, that would mean a P:E ration of 125:1.