3 ms·
That ... feels like a major loophole, still. It requires Twitter to be able to gauge which state funded media are "really" independent. I can't really make a c
by SilasX 7y ago
That ... feels like a major loophole, still. It requires Twitter to be able to gauge which state funded media are "really" independent.
I can't really make a convincing case right now, I'll admit, but it leaves a bad taste in my mouth because it feels like a special exemption for (at least) one state-funded entity, for hand-wavy reasons. That seems like in practice it will translate into a policy of banning any PRC equivalent of the BBC, should it ever exist. (Is there currently something close?)
Edit: mjw1007 gives a sense in which the BBC may be more like Chinese state media in this context [1], while derefr gives a more concrete test for deciding which bucket to put the BBC in [2].
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20740903 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20740903
[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20740759 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20740759
- TulliusCicero 7y agoIt says in the article that they're relying on other organizations like Reporters without Borders to determine editorial independence.
- SilasX 7y agoAh okay. I would have expected a caveat like that to appear in the same paragraph. Thanks for pointing that out.