3 ms·
That's what the article is pushing for: "Consider whether static rendering or server rendering can get you 90% of the way there. It's perfectly okay to mostly
by wffurr 7y ago
That's what the article is pushing for:
"Consider whether static rendering or server rendering can get you 90% of the way there. It's perfectly okay to mostly ship HTML with minimal JS to get an experience interactive."
In other words, just serve some HTML so your users can read your content.
On the other hand, your newspaper writers still need to get paid and unless you're a subscriber, that means ads and cruft on your page for ads.
- _eht 7y agoAds can be done right. It’s rare, but it can be done.
- opencl 7y agoAnd of course the article ignores its own device and is a 1.4MB page containing 10x more JS than HTML.
- kinlan 7y agoWe are hosted in infrastructure that doesn't let us change this (although we are currently migrating a lot of the content off on to another site that we do control). Like many developers, we can only do what we can with the tools we have, but we are changing it.