Interesting that a site published a copycat article of something that the New Yorker ran ten days earlier. Something tells me that external media focus on the

Interesting that a site published a copycat article of something that the New Yorker ran ten days earlier. Something tells me that external media focus on the moderation of this site is going to be something we're all going to wind up regretting. Is all of this coverage organic, or did someone hire a PR firm? (none of the above is meant to imply that the mods here are not doing a good job.)