I agree that a company needs to make sure it has enough cash and cash-like assets to cover their expenses. Failure to do so has often resulted in the dissolutio

I agree that a company needs to make sure it has enough cash and cash-like assets to cover their expenses. Failure to do so has often resulted in the dissolution of the company although it is very rare for that to be the root cause of the dissolution of a public-traded company of SoftBank's size. But again management has broad leeway here. Can you cite one example of a company that was sued because management ran out of cash and cash-equivalents? When you say "fiduciary duty", you imply that the company can be sued.