Lol. Seems the only appropriate response here. It seems obvious that the judge's claim is misguided, but given the nature of the law being referenced by the wa

Lol. Seems the only appropriate response here. It seems obvious that the judge's claim is misguided, but given the nature of the law being referenced by the warrant, its hardly a terrible injustice. I find this quote from the judge interesting as it almost seems like a commentary on the unneccesary absract, opaque language of legal documents in general: > the very ubiquity of mobile phones suggests that, if the parliament had intended that they should be encompassed by the term ‘computer’ it would have been obvious to say so.