5 ms·
One thing overlooked in the article is that we no longer have mothers at home. Society looks down on such women without considering how important constant atte
by 0xDEEPFAC 7y ago
One thing overlooked in the article is that we no longer have mothers at home.
Society looks down on such women without considering how important constant attention is to children in their formative years.
Working households also have more stress and more bills (two cars, childcare, etc).
Why these points weren't considered for the article is beyond me.
- golemiprague 7y agoYou know too well it is because it is the NYT and they got certain agenda so they won't say a word which could interpreted even slightly against the religion of feminism.
- harambae 7y agoTrue, they're probably trying to avoid feminist wrath by getting into that. Along vaguely similar lines, there is a higher incidence of birth outside of marriage than in the past in the USA [0] which ends up affecting some of those things indirectly (if more father influence would push the child in the direction of the outdoors, etc) But most importantly, there's no "P" in hexidecimal. [0] https://www.childtrends.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Nonmarital-births-figure-1.png https://www.childtrends.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Nonma...