2 ms·
The problem with endtime's argument is that it's a non-sequitur. It comes down to: > There is a country where government-run healthcare is bad. Therefore a pro
by majewsky 7y ago
The problem with endtime's argument is that it's a non-sequitur. It comes down to:
> There is a country where government-run healthcare is bad. Therefore a proposed government-run healthcare system is probably also bad.
This simply doesn't follow. I could make the same argument backwards by pointing to a country where government-run healthcare works well, and concluding that therefore universal healthcare in the US is going to be awesome.
endtime is demonstrating his/her sentiment, but does nothing to advance the discussion.
- endtime 7y agoI was responding to a comment which said: > No. There is a very large number of people in the US who are (for whatever reason) against universal health care. I was responding specifically to the "for whatever reason" part, giving an example of a reason.