2 ms·
This is a weird thing. The PCA result, as expected, is basically what the moves of chess for the major pieces look like. Also, I don't think they understand wha
by scottlocklin 7y ago
This is a weird thing. The PCA result, as expected, is basically what the moves of chess for the major pieces look like. Also, I don't think they understand what bitboards are for (move generation and evaluation in a fairly dense/high performance representation); this vector representation is just serial 1-hot encoding. There are alternate vector encodings which actually make more sense for a neural net or matrix representation of chess positions.
I guess the authors have a company that does some kind of NNMF thing on genetic data, which would explain their approach.
- CrazyStat 7y agoMy overall impression is that this was a quick and dirty summer intern project. Nothing against quick and dirty projects but I'm not sure it really belongs on HN.
- thomasahle 7y agoThe 2664 is actually what AlphaZero used. (It just duplicated the whole stack a few times for history.) It's true that chess programmers usually use a different set of bitboards.