4 ms·
Read the italized subtext below the title. I also got caught by the May 2007 date at first. It might be intentionally misleading.
by ced 19y ago
Read the italized subtext below the title.
I also got caught by the May 2007 date at first. It might be intentionally misleading.
- BrandonM 19y agoRight, I saw that, but I read the article (thanks to jkush's submission) on the 8th, and the article's date is May 10. Anyways, it's not important, just a pointless observation.
- brlewis 19y agoI would guess it's the date that will be printed on newsstand issues. I noticed some time ago that a lot of magazines post-date themselves, presumably because people are less likely to buy a magazine that's dated a week ago.